As data requirements continue to rapidly grow, so does the cost of managing storage through devices such as NAS solutions. This puts organizations in a tight spot, as their budgets don’t necessarily correlate with this massive growth, which is why new high-capacity releases like Seagate IronWolf 12TB is so attractive: it helps to lower the total cost of ownership and gives organizations the ability to and stay within and better manage their budgets. The company has also released a Pro version of the drive, reviewed here.
It’s always exciting to see Seagate release a new product on the NAS market, as their previous releases have always been well-received, including the 10TB IronWolf model we reviewed almost a year ago. As such, 12TB IronWolf is the company’s highest capacity, performance-driven NAS HDD to date. Designed to excel in always on, always accessible 24/7 storage servers, the new IronWolf allows businesses to get the most out of their storage devices while being optimized for NAS environments with AgileArray, Seagate’s specific set of hardware, firmware and software features that promote the best possible NAS experience. The IronWolf HDD family is also equipped with dual-plane balancing and RAID optimization in multi-bay environments and offers enterprises with highly efficient and advanced power management capabilities.
Seagate has designed the IronWolf 12TB to handle a workload rate of 180TB/year with an MTBF rating of 1 million hours. This gives users a peace of mind that the new Seagate drive will be able to handle multiple users continuously uploading and downloading data to the NAS server.
Backed by a 3-year limited warranty, the Seagate IronWolf 12TB can be picked up for under $475.
Seagate IronWolf 12TB Specifications:
Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis
Our enterprise hard drive benchmark process preconditions each drive into steady-state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. Since hard drives reach their rated performance level very quickly, we only graph out the main sections of each test.
In the following section of this review, we will test 8 Seagate IronWolf 12TB HDDs performance in both iSCSI and CIFS configurations inside a Netgear 628x (RAID6).
We will be including the following drives as comparables in the NETGEAR 628x configuration:
Our first test measures 4k random performance. Here, the IronWolf topped all other drives when configured in iSCSI with a read score of 652 IOPS; however, its write performance of 612 IOPS fell well short of the Toshiba NAS drive, which scored 964 IOPS in reads (iSCSI).
Results of iSCSI 4k average latency were more or less that same, with the IronWolf just behind its Pro brethren at 392.454ms while reads hit an average of 428.802ms. CIFS connectivity showed similar write performance (433.843ms), though read activity was more than double the latency (820.944ms).
When moving on to max latency, the IronWolf was the clear winner in reads, recording just 1,711.6ms. Writes performance, however, were middle of the run with a maximum latency at 22,919.0ms. CIFS showed 2,960.8ms read and 24,777ms write.
In standard deviation, Seagate IronWolf posted its best read performance when configured in iSCSI with 464.47ms, while recording its best write performance in CIFS with 1,898.31.
The next workload tests the drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. In CIFS configuration, the Seagate IronWolf measured 135,600 IOPS read and 42,054 IOPS write. Again, throughput performance was noticeably higher when using iSCSI connectivity, posting 147,390 read and 54,700 IOPS write.
Our next test shifts focus from a pure 8k sequential 100% read/write scenario to a mixed 8k 70/30 workload where we show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. The IronWolf showed impressive performance when configured in iSCSI, posting a range of 439 IOPS to a leading 648 IOPS. The CIFS configuration, however, ranked at the bottom of the pack at the end with a score of just 150 IOPS.
The IronWolf continued it great RAID6 iSCSI performance in average latency, posting a range of 9.07ms through 394.62ms. The next best drive was the Pro version of the Seagate line, posting 403.45ms.
In max latency, the CIFS configuration had the best performance by the end of the test. Though it started at an incredibly high 5,416.26ms, the IronWolf 12TB stabilized by the end with a leading 3,363.57ms. The iSCSI configuration posted a range of 826.95ms to 7,261.25ms.
Looking at standard deviation, the IronWolf showed its best performance in the endunder CIFS connectivity with a solid 384.04ms (which was second place, just behind its Pro brethren); however, iSCSI showed much better burst performance with 20.97ms (vs. CIFS’s 61.15ms).
Our last test is the 128k benchmark, which is a large-block sequential test that shows the highest sequential transfer speed. In iSCSI, the IronWolf ranked just behind the Pro line (CIFS) in reads with an impressive 1.908GB/s. The IronWolf had slightly better write activity in CIFS with 1.239GB/s, which was the top performing score as well.
Conclusion
The new Seagate IronWolf 12TB capacity is certainly a great addition to the company’s line of NAS, offering impressive performance while promoting total cost of ownership. With this massive 12TB model, the new IronWolf capacity helps organizations who want the smallest physical footprint per TB as possible. To further its compatibility NAS environments, Seagate has optimized IronWolf line with AgileArray and is built with dual-plane balancing and RAID optimization in multi-bay environments. This HDD is also designed to thrive under 24/7 operation, featuring a workload rate of 180TB per year with an MTBF of 1 million hours.
To test the Seagate IronWolf 12TB, we populated the Netgear 628x with 8 drives and looked at both iSCSI and CIFS configurations in RAID6. During these tests, the IronWolf offered impressive overall iSCSI performance numbers. During the 4k random benchmark, the IronWolf outperformed all other drives in iSCSI with 652 IOPS in ready activity; however, its write performance of 612 IOPS fell well short of the first place Toshiba NAS drive. Moving on to our 8k benchmark, the IronWolf showed again showed impressive iSCSI performance with a range of 439 IOPS (in burst) to a leading 648 IOPS. The CIFS configuration showed much weaker performance, however. In our large-block sequential 128k benchmark, the IronWolf ranked just behind the Pro line (CIFS) in reads with a very impressive 1.908GB/s in iSCSI. The new Seagate drive also posted the best overall write performance in CIFS with 1.239GB/s.
Bottom Line
The Seagate IronWolf 12TB is perfect for small offices or home users that want to increase their capacity while maintaining performance they expect from Seagate.
The Samsung 990 EVO Plus is a solid choice for those looking to upgrade their storage, especially if you need…
This article demonstrates building a high-performance, customizable cloud storage server using Ubuntu Server 24.04.1 and Nextcloud Hub 9. It requires…
The MiTAC TYAN HG68-B8016 stands out as a highly flexible platform ideally suited for cloud providers offering tailored server configurations.…
High-density storage solutions and advanced AI significantly impact the monitoring, protecting, and understanding of animal populations. (more…)
The polished VergeIO platform elevates it above alternatives like Proxmox, and it's much more cost-effective and flexible than VMware. (more…)
While not all DaaS solutions are created equal, our experience with Amazon WorkSpaces demonstrated its reliability and cost-effectiveness. (more…)